Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 40.62 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea-Bissau, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guinea-Bissau stood at 40.62. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 8.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guinea-Bissau peaked at 40.62 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 37.5, in 2005.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea-Bissau, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 37.5 | — |
| 2006 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 40.62 | +8.3% |
| 2011 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
Guinea-Bissau compared with similar countries
- Guinea-Bissau's 40.62 is below the median for low income countries, which is 43.75, 93% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Guinea-Bissau's 40.62 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 42.19, 96% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 5 |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 40.62 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau
- 109 Indonesia 40.62 compare
- 109 Azerbaijan 40.62 compare
- 109 Bolivia 40.62 compare
- 109 Costa Rica 40.62 compare
- 109 Djibouti 40.62 compare
- 109 Equatorial Guinea 40.62 compare
- 109 Eswatini 40.62 compare
- 109 Iran 40.62 compare
- 109 Liberia 40.62 compare
- 109 Morocco 40.62 compare
- 109 Spain 40.62 compare
- 109 Sri Lanka 40.62 compare
- 109 Togo 40.62 compare
- 109 Uruguay 40.62 compare
More reference data data for Guinea-Bissau
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0583 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3098 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.395 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.395 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1955 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2346 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1466 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guinea-Bissau?
- Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guinea-Bissau was 40.62 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The highest recorded value was 40.62 in 2010.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The lowest recorded value was 37.5 in 2005.
- How does Guinea-Bissau rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.