Guinea-Bissau vs Togo: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Guinea-Bissau
40.62
in 2014
Togo
40.62
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
109th
Togo rank
109th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Togo
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Togo, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Togo ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Togo ranks 109th of 181 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Togo Difference Ahead
2000s 37.5 37.5 0
2010s 40.62 38.75 1.88 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Togo?
Guinea-Bissau, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Togo as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Togo?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Togo rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Togo ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.