Guinea-Bissau vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
40.62
in 2014
Sri Lanka
40.62
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
109th
Sri Lanka rank
109th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 40.62 | 3.12 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Sri Lanka?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 109th and Sri Lanka ranks 109th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.