Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 40.62 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Costa Rica, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 40.62 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Costa Rica peaked at 40.62 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 40.62, in 2003.
Costa Rica ranks 109th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 40.62 | — |
| 2004 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 40.62 | +0.0% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 40.62 is below the median for high income countries, which is 59.38, 68% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 40.62 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 42.19, 96% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 40.62 | 7 |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 40.62 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 109 Indonesia 40.62 compare
- 109 Azerbaijan 40.62 compare
- 109 Bolivia 40.62 compare
- 109 Djibouti 40.62 compare
- 109 Equatorial Guinea 40.62 compare
- 109 Eswatini 40.62 compare
- 109 Guinea-Bissau 40.62 compare
- 109 Iran 40.62 compare
- 109 Liberia 40.62 compare
- 109 Morocco 40.62 compare
- 109 Spain 40.62 compare
- 109 Sri Lanka 40.62 compare
- 109 Togo 40.62 compare
- 109 Uruguay 40.62 compare
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Costa Rica?
- Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Costa Rica was 40.62 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 40.62 in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 40.62 in 2003.
- How does Costa Rica rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 109th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.