Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 31.25 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at 31.25. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 11.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 31.25 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 28.12, in 2003.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 138th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 28.12 | — |
| 2004 | 28.12 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 28.12 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 28.12 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 31.25 | +11.1% |
| 2008 | 31.25 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 31.25 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 31.25 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 31.25 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 31.25 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 31.25 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 31.25 | +0.0% |
Democratic Republic of Congo compared with similar countries
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 31.25 is below the median for low income countries, which is 43.75, 71% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 31.25 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 42.19, 74% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.46 | 28.12 | 31.25 | 7 |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 3,057 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 235.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 1,764 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 601.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 140.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 313.43 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo was 31.25 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 31.25 in 2007.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 28.12 in 2003.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 138th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.