Comoros vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Comoros
31.25
in 2014
Democratic Republic of Congo
31.25
in 2014
Comoros rank
137th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
137th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Comoros
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 137th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 30 | 1.25 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 31.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Comoros or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Comoros, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Comoros and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Comoros and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Comoros ranks 137th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.