Democratic Republic of Congo vs Qatar: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Democratic Republic of Congo
31.25
in 2014
Qatar
31.25
in 2014
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
137th
Qatar rank
137th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Qatar
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Qatar, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th and Qatar ranks 137th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 31.25 31.25 0
2010s 31.25 31.25 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Qatar?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Qatar as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Qatar?
0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Qatar?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Qatar rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th and Qatar ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.