Democratic Republic of Congo vs Senegal: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Senegal
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Senegal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Senegal ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th and Senegal ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.46 | 28.12 | 1.34 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 30.62 | 0.625 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Senegal?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Senegal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Senegal?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Senegal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Senegal rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 137th and Senegal ranks 137th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.