Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in China

China: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 50 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
50
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
76th
of 184 countries
All-time high
50
in 2003
All-time low
50
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in China, 2003–2014

010203040502003200820142003: 502004: 502005: 502006: 502007: 502008: 502009: 502010: 502011: 502012: 502013: 502014: 50

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

China recorded 50 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in China peaked at 50 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 50, in 2003.

China ranks 76th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in China, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in China, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 50 —
2004 50 +0.0%
2005 50 +0.0%
2006 50 +0.0%
2007 50 +0.0%
2008 50 +0.0%
2009 50 +0.0%
2010 50 +0.0%
2011 50 +0.0%
2012 50 +0.0%
2013 50 +0.0%
2014 50 +0.0%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 50 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • China's 50 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.12, 94% of the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 50 50 50 7
2010s 50 50 50 5

Countries ranked near China

  1. 75 Mexico 50.53 compare
  2. 76 Bosnia and Herzegovina 50 compare
  3. 76 Bulgaria 50 compare
  4. 76 Burkina Faso 50 compare
  5. 76 Cape Verde 50 compare
  6. 76 Italy 50 compare
  7. 76 Lebanon 50 compare
  8. 76 Nicaragua 50 compare
  9. 76 Palau 50 compare
  10. 76 Philippines 50 compare
  11. 76 Solomon Islands 50 compare
  12. 76 Tonga 50 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in China?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in China was 50 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 50 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 50 in 2003.
How does China rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
China ranks 76th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in China. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/china/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.