Bosnia and Herzegovina vs China, People's Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- China, People's Republic of
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 50 against 50 in China, People's Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, China, People's Republic of has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and China, People's Republic of ranks 76th of 183 countries.
China, People's Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | China, People's Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.32 | 50 | 2.68 | China, People's Republic of |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or China, People's Republic of?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 50 against 50 in China, People's Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and China, People's Republic of?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and China, People's Republic of?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and China, People's Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and China, People's Republic of ranks 76th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.