Burkina Faso vs China: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Burkina Faso
50
in 2014
China
50
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
76th
China rank
76th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • China
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 50 against 50 in China, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 76th and China ranks 76th of 181 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso China Difference Ahead
2000s 48.21 50 1.79 China
2010s 50 50 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Burkina Faso or China?
Burkina Faso, at 50 against 50 in China as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Burkina Faso and China?
0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and China?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Burkina Faso and China rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Burkina Faso ranks 76th and China ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.