China vs Italy: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
China
50
in 2014
Italy
50
in 2014
China rank
76th
Italy rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- China
- Italy
How they compare
China currently reports 50 against 50 in Italy, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was China ahead.
China ranks 76th and Italy ranks 76th of 181 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 39.29 | 10.71 | China |
| 2010s | 50 | 50 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, China or Italy?
- China, at 50 against 50 in Italy as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between China and Italy?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Italy?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do China and Italy rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- China ranks 76th and Italy ranks 76th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.