Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan

Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 40.43 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
40.43
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
161st
of 184 countries
All-time high
40.43
in 2004
All-time low
40.43
in 2004
Years of data
11
2004–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2004–2014

0102030402004200920142004: 40.42005: 40.42006: 40.42007: 40.42008: 40.42009: 40.42010: 40.42011: 40.42012: 40.42013: 40.42014: 40.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Sudan recorded 40.43 for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Sudan peaked at 40.43 in 2004 and was at its lowest, 40.43, in 2004.

That places Sudan 161st out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2004 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2004 40.43
2005 40.43 +0.0%
2006 40.43 +0.0%
2007 40.43 +0.0%
2008 40.43 +0.0%
2009 40.43 +0.0%
2010 40.43 +0.0%
2011 40.43 +0.0%
2012 40.43 +0.0%
2013 40.43 +0.0%
2014 40.43 +0.0%

Sudan compared with similar countries

  • Sudan's 40.43 is below the median for low income countries, which is 46.52, 87% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
  • Sudan's 40.43 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 49.8, 81% of the median. (46 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 40.43 40.43 40.43 6
2010s 40.43 40.43 40.43 5

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 158 Senegal 41.48 compare
  2. 159 Micronesia (country) 40.85 compare
  3. 160 Greece 40.6 compare
  4. 162 Pakistan 40.32 compare
  5. 163 Sri Lanka 38.96 compare
  6. 164 Colombia 38.45 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Sudan?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Sudan was 40.43 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 40.43 in 2004.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 40.43 in 2004.
How does Sudan rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Sudan ranks 161st out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/sudan/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.