Pakistan vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Pakistan
40.32
in 2014
Sudan
40.43
in 2014
Pakistan rank
159th
Sudan rank
158th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Pakistan
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 40.43 against 40.32 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 159th and Sudan ranks 158th of 181 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.43 | 40.43 | 3.01 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 40.48 | 40.43 | 0.0535 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Pakistan or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 40.43 against 40.32 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Pakistan and Sudan?
- 0.11, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Pakistan and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Pakistan ranks 159th and Sudan ranks 158th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.