Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 38.96 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
38.96
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
163rd
of 184 countries
All-time high
38.96
in 2003
All-time low
38.96
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sri Lanka, 2003–2014

0102030402003200820142003: 392004: 392005: 392006: 392007: 392008: 392009: 392010: 392011: 392012: 392013: 392014: 39

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Sri Lanka recorded 38.96 for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Sri Lanka peaked at 38.96 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 38.96, in 2003.

Sri Lanka ranks 163rd of 184 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sri Lanka, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sri Lanka, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 38.96 —
2004 38.96 +0.0%
2005 38.96 +0.0%
2006 38.96 +0.0%
2007 38.96 +0.0%
2008 38.96 +0.0%
2009 38.96 +0.0%
2010 38.96 +0.0%
2011 38.96 +0.0%
2012 38.96 +0.0%
2013 38.96 +0.0%
2014 38.96 +0.0%

Sri Lanka compared with similar countries

  • Sri Lanka's 38.96 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57.62, 68% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Sri Lanka's 38.96 is below the median for South Asia, which is 44.31, 88% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 38.96 38.96 38.96 7
2010s 38.96 38.96 38.96 5

Countries ranked near Sri Lanka

  1. 160 Greece 40.6 compare
  2. 161 Sudan 40.43 compare
  3. 162 Pakistan 40.32 compare
  4. 164 Colombia 38.45 compare
  5. 165 Benin 37.73 compare
  6. 166 Belize 37.38 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Sri Lanka

All data for Sri Lanka →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Sri Lanka?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Sri Lanka was 38.96 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Sri Lanka?
The highest recorded value was 38.96 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Sri Lanka?
The lowest recorded value was 38.96 in 2003.
How does Sri Lanka rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Sri Lanka ranks 163rd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sri Lanka. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/sri-lanka/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Sri Lanka</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.