Sri Lanka vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Sri Lanka
38.96
in 2014
Sudan
40.43
in 2014
Sri Lanka rank
160th
Sudan rank
158th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 40.43 against 38.96 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.47.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 158th of 181 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.96 | 40.43 | 1.46 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 38.96 | 40.43 | 1.46 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Sri Lanka or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 40.43 against 38.96 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 1.47, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 160th and Sudan ranks 158th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.