Pakistan vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Pakistan
40.32
in 2014
Sri Lanka
38.96
in 2014
Pakistan rank
159th
Sri Lanka rank
160th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Pakistan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 40.32 against 38.96 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.36.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 159th and Sri Lanka ranks 160th of 181 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.56 | 38.96 | 4.59 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 40.48 | 38.96 | 1.52 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Pakistan or Sri Lanka?
- Pakistan, at 40.32 against 38.96 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Pakistan and Sri Lanka?
- 1.36, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sri Lanka?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Pakistan and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Pakistan ranks 159th and Sri Lanka ranks 160th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.