Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Palau

Palau: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 51.28 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
51.28
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
120th
of 184 countries
All-time high
51.28
in 2013
All-time low
50.24
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Palau, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 50.22004: 50.22005: 50.22006: 50.22007: 50.32008: 50.22009: 50.22010: 50.22011: 50.22012: 50.22013: 51.32014: 51.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Palau recorded 51.28 for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 2.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Palau peaked at 51.28 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 50.24, in 2003.

That places Palau 120th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Palau, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Palau, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 50.24 —
2004 50.24 +0.0%
2005 50.24 +0.0%
2006 50.24 +0.0%
2007 50.26 +0.0%
2008 50.24 -0.0%
2009 50.24 +0.0%
2010 50.24 +0.0%
2011 50.24 +0.0%
2012 50.24 +0.0%
2013 51.28 +2.1%
2014 51.28 +0.0%

Palau compared with similar countries

  • Palau's 51.28 is below the median for high income countries, which is 64.27, 80% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Palau's 51.28 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.95, 81% of the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 50.24 50.24 50.26 7
2010s 50.66 50.24 51.28 5

Countries ranked near Palau

  1. 117 Djibouti 51.79 compare
  2. 118 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 51.74 compare
  3. 119 Saint Kitts and Nevis 51.51 compare
  4. 121 Mali 51.25 compare
  5. 122 Costa Rica 51.13 compare
  6. 123 Kenya 50.98 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Palau

All data for Palau →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Palau?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Palau was 51.28 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Palau?
The highest recorded value was 51.28 in 2013.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Palau?
The lowest recorded value was 50.24 in 2003.
How does Palau rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Palau ranks 120th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Palau?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Palau data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Palau. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/palau/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Palau</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.