Palau vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Palau
51.28
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
51.51
in 2014
Palau rank
119th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
118th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Palau
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 51.51 against 51.28 in Palau, a difference of 0.23.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Palau ranks 119th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 118th of 181 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 50.24 52.5 2.25 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 50.66 52.15 1.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Palau or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 51.51 against 51.28 in Palau as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Palau and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.23, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Palau and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Palau ranks 119th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.