Costa Rica vs Palau: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Costa Rica
51.13
in 2014
Palau
51.28
in 2014
Costa Rica rank
121st
Palau rank
119th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Palau
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Palau currently reports 51.28 against 51.13 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 121st and Palau ranks 119th of 181 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Palau Difference Ahead
2000s 50.55 50.24 0.3059 Costa Rica
2010s 51.13 50.66 0.477 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Palau?
Palau, at 51.28 against 51.13 in Costa Rica as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Palau?
0.15, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Palau?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Costa Rica and Palau rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Costa Rica ranks 121st and Palau ranks 119th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.