Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mali

Mali: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 51.25 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
51.25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
121st
of 184 countries
All-time high
51.25
in 2010
All-time low
45.67
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mali, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 45.72004: 45.72005: 45.72006: 45.72007: 45.72008: 45.72009: 51.12010: 51.32011: 51.32012: 51.32013: 51.32014: 51.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mali stood at 51.25. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 12.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mali peaked at 51.25 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 45.67, in 2003.

Mali ranks 121st of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mali, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mali, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 45.67 —
2004 45.67 +0.0%
2005 45.67 +0.0%
2006 45.67 +0.0%
2007 45.67 +0.0%
2008 45.67 +0.0%
2009 51.09 +11.9%
2010 51.25 +0.3%
2011 51.25 +0.0%
2012 51.25 +0.0%
2013 51.25 +0.0%
2014 51.25 +0.0%

Mali compared with similar countries

  • Mali's 51.25 is above the median for low income countries, which is 46.52, 1.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
  • Mali's 51.25 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 49.8, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 46.44 45.67 51.09 7
2010s 51.25 51.25 51.25 5

Countries ranked near Mali

  1. 118 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 51.74 compare
  2. 119 Saint Kitts and Nevis 51.51 compare
  3. 120 Palau 51.28 compare
  4. 122 Costa Rica 51.13 compare
  5. 123 Kenya 50.98 compare
  6. 124 Kuwait 50.67 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Mali

All data for Mali →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mali?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Mali was 51.25 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Mali?
The highest recorded value was 51.25 in 2010.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Mali?
The lowest recorded value was 45.67 in 2003.
How does Mali rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Mali ranks 121st out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Mali?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mali data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mali. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/mali/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Mali</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.