Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia

Latvia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 75.59 in 2014. ▼ Falling

Latest (2014)
75.59
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
12th
of 184 countries
All-time high
83.44
in 2005
All-time low
75.59
in 2012
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2003–2014

0204060802003200820142003: 802004: 802005: 83.42006: 83.42007: 83.42008: 83.42009: 802010: 802011: 78.32012: 75.62013: 75.62014: 75.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Latvia stood at 75.59. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of down 5.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Latvia peaked at 83.44 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 75.59, in 2012.

Latvia ranks 12th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 79.97 —
2004 79.97 +0.0%
2005 83.44 +4.3%
2006 83.44 +0.0%
2007 83.44 +0.0%
2008 83.44 +0.0%
2009 79.96 -4.2%
2010 79.96 +0.0%
2011 78.32 -2.1%
2012 75.59 -3.5%
2013 75.59 +0.0%
2014 75.59 +0.0%

Latvia compared with similar countries

  • Latvia's 75.59 is above the median for high income countries, which is 64.27, 1.2× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Latvia's 75.59 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 66.94, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 81.96 79.96 83.44 7
2010s 77.01 75.59 79.96 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 9 Belgium 77.67 compare
  2. 10 Australia 76.34 compare
  3. 11 France 76.25 compare
  4. 13 Ireland 75.47 compare
  5. 14 Norway 75.13 compare
  6. 15 Netherlands 75.1 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Latvia?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Latvia was 75.59 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 83.44 in 2005.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 75.59 in 2012.
How does Latvia rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 12th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/latvia/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.