Belgium vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Belgium
77.67
in 2014
Latvia
75.59
in 2014
Belgium rank
9th
Latvia rank
12th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 77.67 against 75.59 in Latvia, a difference of 2.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Belgium ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 12th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.19 | 81.96 | 5.77 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 77.67 | 77.01 | 0.6621 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 77.67 against 75.59 in Latvia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Belgium and Latvia?
- 2.08, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Belgium ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 12th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.