Australia vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Australia
76.34
in 2014
Latvia
75.59
in 2014
Australia rank
10th
Latvia rank
12th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 76.34 against 75.59 in Latvia, a difference of 0.75.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Australia ranks 10th and Latvia ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.5 | 81.96 | 5.46 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 76.54 | 77.01 | 0.4721 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Australia or Latvia?
- Australia, at 76.34 against 75.59 in Latvia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Australia and Latvia?
- 0.75, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 10th and Latvia ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.