How does Norway rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?

Norway ranks 14th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Norway?

Over the last ten years it is up 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Norway data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Norway

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Norway
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Norway: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 75.13 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)

75.13

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

14th

of 181 countries

All-time high

75.13

in 2009

All-time low

74.31

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Norway, 2003–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Norway stood at 75.13. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of up 1.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Norway peaked at 75.13 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 74.31, in 2003.

Norway ranks 14th of 181 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	74.43	74.31	75.13	7
2010s	75.13	75.13	75.13	5

Countries ranked near Norway

11 France 76.25 compare
12 Latvia 75.59 compare
13 Ireland 75.47 compare
15 Netherlands 75.1 compare
16 Germany 74.96 compare
17 Russia 74.16 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Norway

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3703 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3621 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0618 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.24 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7734 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3366 (2050)

All data for Norway →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Norway?: Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Norway was 75.13 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Norway?: The highest recorded value was 75.13 in 2009.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Norway?: The lowest recorded value was 74.31 in 2003.
How does Norway rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?: Norway ranks 14th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Norway?: Over the last ten years it is up 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Norway data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.