Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Uruguay
Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Uruguay, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 2 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Uruguay ranks 160th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 2 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 57% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 2 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 57% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 160 Pakistan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Afghanistan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Bolivia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Ecuador 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Egypt 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Jordan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Libya 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Sudan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Syria 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Palestine 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 160 Yemen 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Uruguay?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Uruguay was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Uruguay rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Uruguay ranks 160th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.