Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Sudan

Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
157th
of 188 countries
All-time high
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Sudan, 2015–2019

00.511.522015201720192015: 2 DB17-20 methodology2016: 2 DB17-20 methodology2017: 2 DB17-20 methodology2018: 2 DB17-20 methodology2019: 2 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Sudan is 2 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Sudan ranks 157th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 157 Pakistan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 157 Afghanistan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 157 Bolivia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 157 Ecuador 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 157 Egypt 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 157 Jordan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 157 Libya 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 157 Syria 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 157 Uruguay 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 157 Palestine 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 157 Yemen 2 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Sudan?
Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Sudan was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Sudan rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Sudan ranks 157th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.