Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Egypt, Arab Republic of
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Uruguay
2 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
159th
Uruguay rank
159th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Egypt, Arab Republic of
  • Uruguay
00.511.52201520172019

How they compare

Egypt, Arab Republic of currently reports 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 159th and Uruguay ranks 159th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Egypt, Arab Republic of or Uruguay?
Egypt, Arab Republic of, at 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Uruguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Uruguay?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Egypt, Arab Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Uruguay?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 159th and Uruguay ranks 159th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/egypt-arab-rep/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/egypt-arab-rep/uruguay/">Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.