Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Turkey
Turkey: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Turkey, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Turkey recorded 3.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Turkey 67th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Turkey
- 66 Mexico 3.75 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Albania 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Armenia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Azerbaijan 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Bulgaria 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Colombia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Denmark 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Dominican Republic 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Estonia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Georgia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 South Korea 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Lithuania 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Madagascar 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Mauritania 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Moldova 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Nicaragua 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Norway 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Palau 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Panama 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Philippines 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Portugal 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Slovakia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Spain 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Sweden 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Taiwan 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Venezuela 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Turkey
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 290.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 2,478 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 24,525 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 14,216 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 245.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 14,216 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 724.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 1,285 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 27,294 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 26,944 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Turkey?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Turkey was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Turkey?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Turkey?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Turkey rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Turkey ranks 67th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Turkey data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.