Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Dominican Republic, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Dominican Republic recorded 3.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of up 75.0% on the previous year and up 75.0% over five years.
Dominican Republic ranks 67th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 66 Mexico 3.75 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Albania 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Armenia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Azerbaijan 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Bulgaria 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Colombia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Denmark 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Estonia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Georgia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 South Korea 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Lithuania 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Madagascar 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Mauritania 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Moldova 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Nicaragua 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Norway 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Palau 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Panama 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Philippines 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Portugal 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Slovakia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Spain 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Sweden 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Taiwan 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Turkey 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 67 Venezuela 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Dominican Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9595 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3273 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Dominican Republic?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Dominican Republic was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 67th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.