Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
1 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
186th
of 191 countries
All-time high
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Equatorial Guinea, 2015–2019

00.20.40.60.812015201720192015: 1 DB17-20 methodology2016: 1 DB17-20 methodology2017: 1 DB17-20 methodology2018: 1 DB17-20 methodology2019: 1 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Equatorial Guinea recorded 1 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology) in Equatorial Guinea, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 1 DB17-20 methodology —
2016 1 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 1 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 1 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 1 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Equatorial Guinea's 1 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 29% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Equatorial Guinea's 1 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 33% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea

  1. 186 Cambodia 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 186 Laos 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 186 Micronesia (country) 1 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea

All data for Equatorial Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Equatorial Guinea?
Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Equatorial Guinea was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Equatorial Guinea rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Equatorial Guinea. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/equatorial-guinea/">Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Equatorial Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.