Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Lao PDR

Lao PDR: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
1 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
183rd
of 188 countries
All-time high
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Lao PDR, 2015–2019

00.20.40.60.812015201720192015: 1 DB17-20 methodology2016: 1 DB17-20 methodology2017: 1 DB17-20 methodology2018: 1 DB17-20 methodology2019: 1 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Lao PDR recorded 1 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Lao PDR ranks 183rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Lao PDR

  1. 183 Cambodia 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 183 Equatorial Guinea 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 183 Micronesia, Fed. Sts. 1 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Lao PDR

All data for Lao PDR →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Lao PDR?
Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Lao PDR was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Lao PDR?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Lao PDR?
The lowest recorded value was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Lao PDR rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Lao PDR ranks 183rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Lao PDR data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.