Cambodia vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Cambodia
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Cambodia rank
185th
Equatorial Guinea rank
185th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.20.40.60.81201520172019

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 185th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Cambodia or Equatorial Guinea?
Cambodia, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Cambodia and Equatorial Guinea?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Equatorial Guinea?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cambodia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Cambodia ranks 185th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/cambodia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/cambodia/equatorial-guinea/">Cambodia vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.