Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Indonesia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Democratic Republic of the Congo
9.4%
in 2019
Indonesia
21.1%
in 2019
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
183rd
Indonesia rank
181st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 21.1% against 9.4% in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 11.7%.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 2.2 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 183rd and Indonesia ranks 181st of 190 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of the Congo | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 6.6% | 14.8% | 8.1% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 21.1% against 9.4% in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Indonesia?
- 11.7%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Indonesia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Indonesia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 183rd and Indonesia ranks 181st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.