Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in El Salvador

El Salvador: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 68.2% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
68.2%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
100th
of 190 countries
All-time high
68.2%
in 2003
All-time low
68.2%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in El Salvador, 2003–2019

02040602003201120192003: 68.22004: 68.22005: 68.22006: 68.22007: 68.22008: 68.22009: 68.22010: 68.22011: 68.22012: 68.22013: 68.22014: 68.22015: 68.22016: 68.22017: 68.22018: 68.22019: 68.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

El Salvador recorded 68.2% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in El Salvador peaked at 68.2% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 68.2%, in 2003.

That places El Salvador 100th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in El Salvador, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in El Salvador, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 68.2%
2004 68.2% +0.0%
2005 68.2% +0.0%
2006 68.2% +0.0%
2007 68.2% +0.0%
2008 68.2% +0.0%
2009 68.2% +0.0%
2010 68.2% +0.0%
2011 68.2% +0.0%
2012 68.2% +0.0%
2013 68.2% +0.0%
2014 68.2% +0.0%
2015 68.2% +0.0%
2016 68.2% +0.0%
2017 68.2% +0.0%
2018 68.2% +0.0%
2019 68.2% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 68.2% 68.2% 68.2% 7
2010s 68.2% 68.2% 68.2% 10

Countries ranked near El Salvador

  1. 97 Italy 69.1% compare
  2. 98 Guinea-Bissau 68.6% compare
  3. 99 Iraq 68.5% compare
  4. 101 Republic of Moldova 67.9% compare
  5. 101 North Macedonia 67.9% compare
  6. 103 Bahamas 67.6% compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for El Salvador

All data for El Salvador →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in El Salvador?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in El Salvador was 68.2% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in El Salvador?
The highest recorded value was 68.2% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in El Salvador?
The lowest recorded value was 68.2% in 2003.
How does El Salvador rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
El Salvador ranks 100th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in El Salvador?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this El Salvador data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in El Salvador. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/el-salvador/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in El Salvador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.