El Salvador vs Iraq: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
El Salvador
68.2%
in 2019
Iraq
68.5%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
100th
Iraq rank
99th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 68.5% against 68.2% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 100th and Iraq ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.2% | 64.5% | 3.6% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 68.2% | 68.5% | 0.3% | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, El Salvador or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 68.5% against 68.2% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between El Salvador and Iraq?
- 0.3%, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Iraq?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Iraq rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 100th and Iraq ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.