Bahamas vs El Salvador: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bahamas
67.6%
in 2019
El Salvador
68.2%
in 2019
Bahamas rank
103rd
El Salvador rank
100th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 68.2% against 67.6% in Bahamas, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 103rd and El Salvador ranks 100th of 191 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.6% | 68.2% | 0.6% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 67.6% | 68.2% | 0.6% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bahamas or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 68.2% against 67.6% in Bahamas as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bahamas and El Salvador?
- 0.6%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and El Salvador?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and El Salvador rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 103rd and El Salvador ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.