Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Moldova
Moldova: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 67.9% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Moldova, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Moldova recorded 67.9% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 11.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Moldova peaked at 81.4% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 67.9%, in 2011.
That places Moldova 101st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 17 years of available data.
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Moldova, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 81.4% | — |
| 2004 | 81.4% | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 81.4% | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 81.4% | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 81.4% | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 81.4% | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 76.6% | -5.9% |
| 2010 | 76.6% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 67.9% | -11.3% |
| 2012 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 67.9% | +0.0% |
Moldova compared with similar countries
- Moldova's 67.9% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.7%, 1.0× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Moldova's 67.9% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 74.9%, 91% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.7% | 76.6% | 81.4% | 7 |
| 2010s | 68.8% | 67.9% | 76.6% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
- 98 Guinea-Bissau 68.6% compare
- 99 Iraq 68.5% compare
- 100 El Salvador 68.2% compare
- 101 North Macedonia 67.9% compare
- 103 Bahamas 67.6% compare
- 104 Afghanistan 67.5% compare
- 104 Vietnam 67.5% compare
More reference data data for Moldova
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2466 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1366 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.118 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6426 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Moldova?
- Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Moldova was 67.9% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 81.4% in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 67.9% in 2011.
- How does Moldova rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Moldova ranks 101st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.