Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Chile

Chile: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 71.3% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
71.3%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
77th
of 191 countries
All-time high
71.3%
in 2003
All-time low
71.3%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Chile, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 71.32004: 71.32005: 71.32006: 71.32007: 71.32008: 71.32009: 71.32010: 71.32011: 71.32012: 71.32013: 71.32014: 71.32015: 71.32016: 71.32017: 71.32018: 71.32019: 71.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Chile recorded 71.3% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Chile peaked at 71.3% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 71.3%, in 2003.

That places Chile 77th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Chile, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 71.3% —
2004 71.3% +0.0%
2005 71.3% +0.0%
2006 71.3% +0.0%
2007 71.3% +0.0%
2008 71.3% +0.0%
2009 71.3% +0.0%
2010 71.3% +0.0%
2011 71.3% +0.0%
2012 71.3% +0.0%
2013 71.3% +0.0%
2014 71.3% +0.0%
2015 71.3% +0.0%
2016 71.3% +0.0%
2017 71.3% +0.0%
2018 71.3% +0.0%
2019 71.3% +0.0%

Chile compared with similar countries

  • Chile's 71.3% is below the median for high income countries, which is 74.5%, 96% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Chile's 71.3% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 66.4%, 1.1× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 71.3% 71.3% 71.3% 7
2010s 71.3% 71.3% 71.3% 10

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 75 Israel 71.7% compare
  2. 76 Tajikistan 71.4% compare
  3. 78 Montenegro 71.2% compare
  4. 79 Kiribati 71.1% compare
  5. 79 Romania 71.1% compare
  6. 79 Singapore 71.1% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Chile?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Chile was 71.3% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 71.3% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 71.3% in 2003.
How does Chile rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Chile ranks 77th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Chile. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/chile/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.