Chile vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Chile
71.3%
in 2019
Tajikistan
71.4%
in 2019
Chile rank
77th
Tajikistan rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Chile
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 71.4% against 71.3% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 77th and Tajikistan ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.3% | 71.4% | 0.1% | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 71.3% | 71.4% | 0.1% | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Chile or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 71.4% against 71.3% in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Chile and Tajikistan?
- 0.1%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Chile ranks 77th and Tajikistan ranks 76th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.