Chile vs Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Chile
71.3%
in 2019
Kiribati
71.1%
in 2019
Chile rank
77th
Kiribati rank
79th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Chile
- Kiribati
How they compare
Chile currently reports 71.3% against 71.1% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 77th and Kiribati ranks 79th of 190 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.3% | 71.1% | 0.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 71.3% | 71.1% | 0.2% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Chile or Kiribati?
- Chile, at 71.3% against 71.1% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Chile and Kiribati?
- 0.2%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kiribati?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Kiribati rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Chile ranks 77th and Kiribati ranks 79th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.