Chile vs Romania: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Chile
71.3%
in 2019
Romania
71.1%
in 2019
Chile rank
77th
Romania rank
79th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Chile
- Romania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 71.3% against 71.1% in Romania, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Romania ahead.
Chile ranks 77th and Romania ranks 79th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.3% | 79.8% | 8.5% | Romania |
| 2010s | 71.3% | 71.1% | 0.2% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Chile or Romania?
- Chile, at 71.3% against 71.1% in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Chile and Romania?
- 0.2%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Romania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Romania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Chile ranks 77th and Romania ranks 79th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.