Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Democratic Republic of Congo 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Democratic Republic of Congo compared with similar countries
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 0.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.75 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 0.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
- 152 Burundi 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Djibouti 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Dominican Republic 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Equatorial Guinea 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Guatemala 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Haiti 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Lebanon 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Nepal 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Netherlands 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Nicaragua 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Venezuela 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 235.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 220.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 3,924 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 3,057 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3528 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 601.15 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Democratic Republic of Congo was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.