Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Dominican Republic, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Dominican Republic recorded 0.5 DB16-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Dominican Republic 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.5 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Dominican Republic compared with similar countries
- Dominican Republic's 0.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2.25 DB16-20 methodology, 22% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Dominican Republic's 0.5 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 25% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 152 Burundi 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Djibouti 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Equatorial Guinea 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Guatemala 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Haiti 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Lebanon 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Nepal 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Netherlands 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Nicaragua 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 152 Venezuela 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Dominican Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9595 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3273 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Dominican Republic?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Dominican Republic was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 152nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.