Democratic Republic of Congo vs Venezuela: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6)

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Venezuela
0.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
150th
Venezuela rank
150th

Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Venezuela
00.10.20.30.40.5201520172019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Venezuela, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Venezuela has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 150th and Venezuela ranks 150th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: case management (0-6), Democratic Republic of Congo or Venezuela?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology against 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in Venezuela as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Venezuela?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Venezuela?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Venezuela rank globally for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 150th and Venezuela ranks 150th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.