Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Nepal
Nepal: Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) in Nepal, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Nepal stood at 0.5 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Nepal ranks 150th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Countries ranked near Nepal
- 150 Burundi 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Democratic Republic of Congo 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Dominican Republic 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Equatorial Guinea 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Guatemala 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Haiti 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Lebanon 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Netherlands 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Nicaragua 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 150 Venezuela 0.5 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Nepal
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7853 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7753 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 18.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 2,990 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 211.32 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 688.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.33 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Nepal?
- Enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) in Nepal was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5 DB16-20 methodology in 2019.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: case management (0-6) recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Nepal rank for enforcing contracts: case management (0-6)?
- Nepal ranks 150th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Case management (0-6) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The case management evaluates six aspects of the court case management system: (i) whether there are regulations setting time standards for key court events; (ii) whether there are regulations on adjournments and continuances; (iii) whether performance measurement reports are publicly available; (iv) whether a pretrial conference is available; (v) whether an electronic case management system for judges is available; and (vi) whether an electronic case management system for lawyers is available. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.