Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in South Sudan

South Sudan: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.4 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.4
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
191st
of 218 countries
All-time high
0.4
in 2020
All-time low
0
in 2014
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in South Sudan, 2004–2023

00.10.20.30.42004201320232004: 0.22005: 0.22006: 0.22007: 0.22008: 0.22009: 0.22010: 0.32011: 0.32012: 0.32013: 0.32014: 02015: 0.22016: 0.22017: 0.22018: 0.22019: 0.22020: 0.42021: 0.42022: 0.42023: 0.4

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

South Sudan recorded 0.4 for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in 2023. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 33.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in South Sudan peaked at 0.4 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2014.

That places South Sudan 191st out of 218 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in South Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in South Sudan, 2004 to 2023.
Year Value Change
2004 0.2 —
2005 0.2 +0.0%
2006 0.2 +0.0%
2007 0.2 +0.0%
2008 0.2 +0.0%
2009 0.2 +0.0%
2010 0.3 +50.0%
2011 0.3 +0.0%
2012 0.3 +0.0%
2013 0.3 +0.0%
2014 0 -100.0%
2015 0.2 —
2016 0.2 +0.0%
2017 0.2 +0.0%
2018 0.2 +0.0%
2019 0.2 +0.0%
2020 0.4 +100.0%
2021 0.4 +0.0%
2022 0.4 +0.0%
2023 0.4 +0.0%

South Sudan compared with similar countries

  • South Sudan's 0.4 is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.8, 50% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
  • South Sudan's 0.4 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.8, 50% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2 0.2 0.2 6
2010s 0.22 0 0.3 10
2020s 0.4 0.4 0.4 4

Countries ranked near South Sudan

  1. 188 Sudan 0.466 compare
  2. 188 Suriname 0.466 compare
  3. 188 Syria 0.466 compare
  4. 191 American Samoa 0.4 compare
  5. 191 Aruba 0.4 compare
  6. 191 Bermuda 0.4 compare
  7. 191 British Virgin Islands 0.4 compare
  8. 191 Cuba 0.4 compare
  9. 191 Faroe Islands 0.4 compare
  10. 191 French Polynesia 0.4 compare
  11. 191 Gibraltar 0.4 compare
  12. 191 Greenland 0.4 compare
  13. 191 Guam 0.4 compare
  14. 191 Isle of Man 0.4 compare
  15. 191 Northern Mariana Islands 0.4 compare
  16. 191 Puerto Rico 0.4 compare
  17. 191 Saint Martin (French Part) 0.4 compare
  18. 191 United States Virgin Islands 0.4 compare
  19. 191 Channel Islands 0.4 compare

See the full ranking of 219 places →

More reference data data for South Sudan

All data for South Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in South Sudan?
Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in South Sudan was 0.4 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in South Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 0.4 in 2020.
What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in South Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2014.
How does South Sudan rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
South Sudan ranks 191st out of 218 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in South Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is up 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Sudan data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in South Sudan. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-1-5-data-use-by-international-organizations/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-1-5-data-use-by-international-organizations/south-sudan/">Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in South Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,380 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further