Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Cuba
Cuba: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.4 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Cuba, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
The most recent figure for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Cuba is 0.4, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Cuba peaked at 0.6 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.2, in 2004.
Cuba ranks 188th of 214 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.45 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 185 Sudan 0.466 compare
- 185 Suriname 0.466 compare
- 185 Syria 0.466 compare
- 188 American Samoa 0.4 compare
- 188 Aruba 0.4 compare
- 188 Bermuda 0.4 compare
- 188 British Virgin Islands 0.4 compare
- 188 Faroe Islands 0.4 compare
- 188 French Polynesia 0.4 compare
- 188 Gibraltar 0.4 compare
- 188 Greenland 0.4 compare
- 188 Guam 0.4 compare
- 188 Isle of Man 0.4 compare
- 188 Northern Mariana Islands 0.4 compare
- 188 Puerto Rico 0.4 compare
- 188 South Sudan 0.4 compare
- 188 Saint Martin (French part) 0.4 compare
- 188 United States Virgin Islands 0.4 compare
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0502 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Cuba?
- Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Cuba was 0.4 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6 in 2015.
- What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2 in 2004.
- How does Cuba rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
- Cuba ranks 188th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further