Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Suriname

Suriname: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.466 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.466
Change on year
up 16.5%
World rank
185th
of 214 countries
All-time high
0.6
in 2020
All-time low
0.1
in 2012
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Suriname, 2004–2023

0.10.20.30.40.50.62004201320232004: 0.22005: 0.22006: 0.22007: 0.22008: 0.22009: 0.22010: 0.32011: 0.32012: 0.12013: 0.12014: 0.12015: 0.42016: 0.42017: 0.52018: 0.52019: 0.52020: 0.62021: 0.52022: 0.42023: 0.466

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

Suriname recorded 0.466 for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in 2023.

That represents a change of up 16.5% on the previous year and up 366.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Suriname peaked at 0.6 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.1, in 2012.

That places Suriname 185th out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2 0.2 0.2 6
2010s 0.32 0.1 0.5 10
2020s 0.4915 0.4 0.6 4

Countries ranked near Suriname

  1. 185 Sudan 0.466 compare
  2. 185 Syria 0.466 compare
  3. 188 American Samoa 0.4 compare
  4. 188 Aruba 0.4 compare
  5. 188 Bermuda 0.4 compare
  6. 188 British Virgin Islands 0.4 compare
  7. 188 Cuba 0.4 compare
  8. 188 Faroe Islands 0.4 compare
  9. 188 French Polynesia 0.4 compare
  10. 188 Gibraltar 0.4 compare
  11. 188 Greenland 0.4 compare
  12. 188 Guam 0.4 compare
  13. 188 Isle of Man 0.4 compare
  14. 188 Northern Mariana Islands 0.4 compare
  15. 188 Puerto Rico 0.4 compare
  16. 188 South Sudan 0.4 compare
  17. 188 Saint Martin (French part) 0.4 compare
  18. 188 United States Virgin Islands 0.4 compare

See the full ranking of 217 places →

More reference data data for Suriname

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Suriname?
Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Suriname was 0.466 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Suriname?
The highest recorded value was 0.6 in 2020.
What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Suriname?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1 in 2012.
How does Suriname rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
Suriname ranks 185th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Suriname?
Over the last ten years it is up 366.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Suriname data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further