The demographic transition in Sweden in Uruguay
Uruguay: The demographic transition in Sweden was 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009. ▼ Falling
Latest (2009)
14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 1.0%
World rank
24th
of 56 countries
All-time high
43 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1882
All-time low
14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2009
Years of data
128
1882–2009
The demographic transition in Sweden in Uruguay, 1882–2009
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2009. That is the lowest value across all 128 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.0% on the previous year and down 14.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Uruguay peaked at 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1882 and was at its lowest, 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2009.
Uruguay ranks 24th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 128 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1882 | 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1883 | 42.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1884 | 38.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.7% |
| 1885 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.6% |
| 1886 | 41.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1887 | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1888 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -55.3% |
| 1889 | 41.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +121.3% |
| 1890 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1891 | 40.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1892 | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1893 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1894 | 38.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1895 | 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1896 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1897 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -15.1% |
| 1898 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1899 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1900 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1901 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1902 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1903 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1904 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -18.8% |
| 1905 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +21.2% |
| 1906 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1907 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1908 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.2% |
| 1909 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1910 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1911 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1912 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1913 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1914 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.8% |
| 1915 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1916 | 27.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1917 | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1918 | 27.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1919 | 27.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1920 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1921 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1922 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1923 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1924 | 25.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1925 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1926 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1927 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1928 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1929 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1930 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1931 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1932 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1933 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.7% |
| 1934 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1935 | 20.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1936 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1937 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1938 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1939 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1940 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1941 | 20.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1942 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1943 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1944 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1945 | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1946 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.8% |
| 1947 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.5% |
| 1948 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1949 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1951 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1952 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1953 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1955 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.3% |
| 1956 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.8% |
| 1957 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1958 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1960 | 23.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.8% |
| 1961 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.6% |
| 1962 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1963 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1964 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1965 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1966 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1967 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1968 | 22.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1969 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.0% |
| 1970 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1971 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1972 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1973 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1974 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1975 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1976 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1977 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1978 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1979 | 19.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1980 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1981 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1982 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1983 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1984 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1985 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1986 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1987 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1988 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1989 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1990 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1991 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1992 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1993 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1994 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1995 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1996 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1997 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1998 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1999 | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 2000 | 16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 2001 | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 2002 | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 2004 | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 2005 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 2006 | 14.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 14.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 14.24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.2× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 77% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Uruguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1889 | +121.3% | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1888 | -55.3% | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 38.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8 |
| 1890s | 37.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 31.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 29.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 25.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 21.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 20.26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 20.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 22.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 20.09 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 18.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 17.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 21 Costa Rica 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 22 Chile 14.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 23 New Zealand 14.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 25 Trinidad and Tobago 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 26 Australia 13.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 27 Martinique 13.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Uruguay?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Uruguay was 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1882.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009.
- How does Uruguay rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Uruguay ranks 24th out of 56 countries with data for 2009.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 128 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.